Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 596-600, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-810808

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To investigate the microbiological test, antibiotic sensitivity and surgical treatment of periprosthetic joint infection(PJI) cases in post total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients.@*Methods@#A retrospective cross-sectional survey was conducted on 318 patients who underwent THA or TKA in 9 clinical centers in Beijing from January 2014 to December 2016.The data of microbiology, antibiotic sensitivity and surgical treatment were collected.The average age of patients was (62.3±13.1) years old (range: 21-86 years old), including 145 males and 173 females.The body mass index was (25.6±3.8) kg/m 2 (range: 15.6-38.1 kg/m2).@*Results@#In total, 318 patients had microorganisms detected by periprosthetic tissue culture or synovial fluid culture, 209 cases (65.7%) had Gram-positive bacteria, 29 cases (9.1%) had Gram-negative bacteria, 10 cases (3.1%) had fungi, 3 cases (0.9%) had non-tuberculous mycobacteria, 72 cases (22.6%) were negative, 69 cases (21.7%) had methicillin-resistant bacteria. The antibiotic sensitivity results showed that the overall resistance rate of penicillin, cefuroxime, amoxicillin+clavulanic acid was 79.9%, 69.9%, and 68.1%, respectively; meropenem, vancomycin, and linezolid resistance rate was 0. For the treatment methods of hip and knee PJI, two-stage revision surgery acounted for 72.9% (108/148) and 64.1% (109/170), respectively. One-stage revision surgery accounted for 21.6% (32/148) and 7.6% (13/170), and open debridement surgery accounted for 4.7%(7/148) and 26.4% (45/170).@*Conclusions@#Gram-positive bacteria was still the main pathogen of PJI.The methicillin-resistant bacteria and rare bacteria should be payed attention to. The Majority of hip and knee PJI cases were treated by two-stage revision surgery.

2.
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics ; (12): 129-136, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-708517

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate surgical interventions for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty and characteristics of prognosis.Methods Sixty-two patients with PJI after total knee arthroplasty from January 2000 to November 2016 were reviewed retrospectively,included with 17 males and 45 females.The mean age was 66.0± 10.2 years old (37-85).Fourty-nine patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis,9 with rheumatoid arthritis,2 with secondary ankyloses after suppurative arthritis and 2 with hemophilia arthritis.Forty-one patients underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasties,and 21 bilateral total knee arthroplasties.Characteristics of PJI,including infection types,existence of sinus tract,infectious pathogen,surgical intervention and patients' prognosis,were collected.Results Twenty-four patients underwent open debridement with prothesis retention.In the 14 successful cases,medial time interval between primary total knee arthroplasty and debridement was 33 days.One case of positive Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus culture of joint aspiration,and 1 case formed sinus tract.In 10 cases of failed debridement,the medial time interval was 270 d.Intra-articular culture presented 4 cases of antibiotic resistant bacteria,and 6 cases formed sinus tract.Except for one patient gave up treatment and another received arthrodesis,the other 8 failed cases were all treated with revisions.In 46 revisions,nine patients underwent one-stage revisions.The mean time interval between primary total knee arthroplasty and revision was 15.9± 14.5 d.Intra-articular culture presented 3 cases of antibiotic resistant bacteria,and 1 case formed sinus tract.In the other 37 two-stage revisions,the mean time interval was 1 045.7±1 044.1 d.Intra-articular culture showed 15 cases of antibiotic resistant bacteria,and 12 cases formed sinus tract.The mean follow-up duration was 73.9±48.2 months.At the last follow-up,all patients were free of antibiotics treatment.The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) was 85.9±4.3 after successful open debridement with prothesis retention.The KSS of one-stage revision patients was 78.5±3.3,while that of two stage revision patients was 65.7±7.4.Statistical difference was found among groups (P<0.05).Conclusion For PJI within 3 weeks after total knee arthroplasty without sinus tract or intra-articular culture of antibiotic resistant bacteria,open debridement with prosthesis retention could be recommended.One stage revision could be applied in infectious cases which appeared between 3 weeks to 1 month after primary surgery or in cases with unstable prostheses found in open debridement.For infectious cases longer than 1 month after primary procedure or those with sinus tract,severe soft tissue deficiency,intra-articular culture of antibiotic resistant bacteria,two-stage revision could be recommended.

3.
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics ; (12): 406-412, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-491174

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the additional efficacy of local anesthetic injection (LAI) as a part of multimodal anal?gesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with respect to pain, narcotic use, knee function and complications. Methods A multicenter randomized, controlled, double blind study was performed. A total of 101 patients undergoing unilateral TKA in two centers were randomly divided into injection group and control group. Injection group (50 cases) received local anes?thetic injection of ropivacaine (200 mg), fentanyl (1μg) and epinephrine (1∶1 000, 0.25 mg) in operation and control group (51 cas?es) did not. All patients received standardized general anesthesia and postoperative intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Preoperative baseline data, surgery?related conditions, postoperative pain (on a 0 to 10 scale), knee function, time of open?ing PCA, narcotic dosage in PCA and complications were compared respectively. Results The time of opening PCA in injection group (4-10 h, M=8 h) was longer than that in control group (2-5 h, M=4 h) (P0.05). Conclusion LIA in TKA can relieve pain early after TKA, prolong the time of opening PCA and reduce narcotic use compared with patients without it. It is simple and safe to use.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL